Gedimino kilmė: tarp legendų ir istorijos

LTAtidesnis žvilgsnis į miglotas ir legendines vėlyvųjų (XV–XVI a.) šaltinių ir skurdžias XIII–XIV a. šaltinių užuominas, jų gretinimas ir analizė, leidžia naujai pažvelgti į iki šiol neatsakytus klausimus apie Gedimino kilmę. Tai – vieni iš tų klausimų, į kuriuos vargu ar galima rasti visiškai patikimus atsakymus, bet į kuriuos istoriografijoje neišvengiamai ieškoma atsakymų ir jie formuluojami, netgi tampa tarsi visuotinai priimtomis tiesomis, kaip antai XIX a. istoriografijoje įsitvirtinusi tezė, kad Gediminas buvo Vytenio brolis. Šiuo straipsniu siekiama parodyti, kad seni ir įsigalėję stereotipai ne visada yra geriausias sprendimas, o pakartotinė šaltinių analizė gali padėti sukonstruoti kitokias ir labiau pagrįstas versijas, geriau paaiškinančias šaltinių visumą. Atskleisime, kad Gediminas greičiausiai buvo kilęs iš valdančiosios giminės šalutinės šakos, t. y. jo tėvas nebuvo Lietuvos valdovas ir nebuvo tapatus Vytenio tėvui Pukuverui-Butvydui, atitinkamai reikia pripažinti nepagrįsta ir tezę, kad Gediminas ir jo pirmtakas Vytenis buvo broliai. Raktažodžiai: Gediminas, Gediminaičiai, Vytenis, valdančioji giminė, genealogija, genealoginės legendos.

ENTwo versions of the origins of Gediminas developed in the fifteenth-sixteenth centuries. According to the first one, Gediminas was a stableman of Vytenis and ascended to the throne after his death. The second version, which appeared in response to the first one, claimed that Gediminas was Vytenis’s son. These versions were not only the product of imagination of their authors; they may carry fragments of the authentic tale about the origins of the Gediminids and hence historical realities, which deserve a thorough scrutiny. In the nineteenth century, the Russian historian Alexander Nikitsky added a third version based on the letter of the citizens of Riga to Gediminas of 1322, in which Vytenis was referred to as ‘your brother and predecessor’ (frater vester et antecessor): respectively, he concluded that Gediminas was Vytenis’s brother. Therefore, it is worth taking a fresh look at each of these versions and the available data on the origins of Gediminas with a fresh look. The prerequisite for such a revision is the oldest genealogy of the sons of Algirdas provided in the late fourteenth-century Russian literary tale Zadonshchina listing the successive line of their ancestors as Skalmantas – Gediminas – Algirdas – Andrew and Dmitri (the protagonists of the said poem). Jerzy Ochmański noticed it already in 1974. Ochmański tried to accommodate this genealogy with Nikitsky’s theory, accepting that Vytenis’s father, namely, Pukuveras-Butvydas, was also the father of Gediminas and therefore assumed that Skalmantas must have been their grandfather. However, the genealogy in Zadonshchina directly implies that Skalmantas was Gediminas’s father.As Peter of Dusburg wrote in his chronicle, that the father of Vytenis was Pucuwerus (identified with Butvydas), Vytenis and Gediminas could not be full brothers; that the fact that Vytenis was called frater of Gediminas should be interpreted rather as a clue to a more distant relationship, namely, cousinhood. Further analysis of the genealogy of Gediminas also demands a scrutiny of the terms ‘predecessor’ and ‘progenitor’, which are used in his own letters. The term ‘predecessor’ was applied in reference to earlier rulers of Lithuania (namely, Mindaugas and Vytenis); the term ‘progenitor’ means direct ancestors. Gediminas stated that his progenitores (ancestors) had tried to establish trade relations with Lübeck and other cites of the Hanseatic League. This implies that at least two direct ancestors of Gediminas ruled Lithuania and sought to establishing relationship with Lübeck. Considering this, the most probable ancestors of Gediminas seem to be Traidenis (1268–1281) and his successor Daumantas (1281–1285). The article tries to prove that the most likely relationship between them and Gediminas was that both of them were his grandfathers: Traidenis on the maternal side and Daumantas on the paternal. Besides that, Daumantas and/or his family must have supported Vaišalgas, Mindaugas’s son and Traidenis’s rival. Traidenis could have married off his unknown elder daughter to Skalmantas, who must have been a son of Daumantas, in order to draw the supporters of his rival to his side.

• Chartularium Lithuaniae res gestas magni ducis Gedeminne illustrans.. Vilnius : Vaga, 2003. 480 p.
• Garuozos mūšis: šaltiniai ir interpretacijos. [Šiauliai] : [Lucilijus] ; 2017. 133 p.
• Iš viduramžių ūkų kylanti Lietuva: pagonių imperija Rytų ir Vidurio Europoje, 1295-1345.. Vilnius : Baltos lankos, [2001]. 381 p.
• Lietuvos didieji kunigaikščiai.. Vilnius : Mokslo ir enciklopedijų leidykla, 1996. 402 p.
• Lietuvos Didžioji Kunigaikštystė: politika ir visuomenė vėlyvaisiais Viduramžiais. Vilnius : Lietuvių katalikų mokslo akademija : 2017. 447 p.
• Sumaišties laikotarpis XIII a. pab. Lietuvos Didžiojoje Kunigaikštystėje: 1285 m. Daumanto atvejis. Lituanistica 2024, 1, 1-18.
• Traidenis: monarcho valdžios atkūrimas Lietuvoje, (1268-1282). Vilnius : Lietuvos istorijos instituto leidykla, 2009. 242 p.