Wielopiśmienność Wielkiego Księstwa Litewskiego: nowe perspektywy badawcze

Collection:
Mokslo publikacijos / Scientific publications
Document Type:
Straipsnis / Article
Language:
Lenkų kalba / Polish
Title:
Wielopiśmienność Wielkiego Księstwa Litewskiego: nowe perspektywy badawcze
Alternative Title:
Multi-literacy in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania: a new research approach
In the Journal:
Keywords:
LT
Baltarusija (Belarus); Kipras (Cyprus); Lenkija (Poland); Malta; Lietuva (Lithuania); Užsienio literatūra / Foreign literature.
Summary / Abstract:

LTReikšminiai žodžiai: Ankstyvoji modernioji literatūra; Ankstyvoji modernioji musulmonų literatūra Lietuvoje; Baltarusiška literatūra; Lenkiška literatūra; Lietuvos Didžioji Kunigaikštystė (LDK; Grand Duchy of Lithuania; GDL); Lietuvos Didžiosios Kunigaikštystės istorija; Lotyniška literatūra; Paribio kultūra; Senoji Baltarusijos literatūra; Senoji Lenkijos literatūra; Skaitymo ir rašymo istorija; Byelorussian literature; Culture of borderline; Early modern Muslim literature in Lithuania; Early modern literature; History of reading and writing; Latin literature; Old-Byelorussian literature; Old-Polish literature; Polish literature; The Grand Duchy of Lithuania; The Grand Duchy of Lithuania history.

ENThe paper deals with the problem of using different languages of writing in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania in the 15th–17th centuries. Among them there were: Latin, ­Polish, Ruthenian, Church-Slavonic, Lithuanian, German, Yiddish, Hebrew, Arabic and Greek, written in five alphabets: Latin, Cyryllic, Hebrew, Arabic and Greek. The author noticed that this multi-lingualism and multi-alphabeticism was omitted in Polish studies about history of literature of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. He argues that including these two issues in the studies on the Commonwealth’s history is crucial to better understand the multicultural and multi-ethnic character of this country. One of the main questions of the paper is about the relationship between a script and an identity. The author notices that comparative approach can be especially productive in such research. He enlists similar borderline processes in use of writing in medieval and early modern England, Sicily, Malta, Cyprus, Venice, Dubrovnik, Moldova and Andalusia. It is illustrated by a few cases of use of the Cyryllic, Latin and Arabic alphabets. The author draws a comparison between the 16th-century literary languages of Spanish Moriscos and Lithuanian Tatars. Both these languages were based on the written version of a vernacular language (Romance and Byelorussian) in the Arabic alphabet. [From the publication]

DOI:
10.4467/2084395XWI.14.019.2820
ISSN:
1897-1962
Related Publications:
Permalink:
https://www.lituanistika.lt/content/57567
Updated:
2022-01-04 13:40:06
Metrics:
Views: 24
Export: