Kultūros alkis, kalbos teatras: švietėjiška Aldonos Liobytės publicistika
LTStraipsnyje apžvelgiamos Aldonos Liobytės spaudos publikacijos: recenzijos, straipsniai, apžvalgos, reportažai - ir juose keliamos kultūrinės įvairovės, meninio novatoriškumo, modernumo, taip pat istorinės atminties problemos. Atskirai aptariama Liobytės publicistikos kalbinė raiška, rašymo stilius (kalbos suasm eninim as, juslingum as, tautosakinė retorika). Pastebima, kad Liobytės publicistikoje išryškėja savita, Lietuvos pokario kultūros procesui svarbi kūrybinė laikysena, orientuota į autentiškumą, pažinimą, akiračio plėtimą, siekį skatinti visuomenės kultūrinį smalsumą ir kritinį mąstymą. Tokios sąmoningumo linkm ės išryškėja kaip priešprieša unifikuojančioms režimo tendencijoms. [Iš leidinio]Reikšminiai žodžiai: Aldona Liobytė; Publicistika; Sociokultūrinė laikysena; Nepriklausomas žmogus; Švietėjiškos intencijos; Pokario kultūra; Aldona Liobytė; Journalistic texts; Sociocultural posture; Independent human; Social energy; Educative intentions; Post-war culture.
ENAldona Liobytė’s bold, lively, artistic, and ironic personal mien apparent from her letters and reminiscences of her contemporaries is appreciated as a significant contribution to the post-war history of Lithuanian culture and is considered even more important than her literary legacy. Vytautas Kavolis, a cultural sociologist, wrote about a personal character and temperament that can acquire a more universal meaning in culture by turning into certain forms of interpretation of experience and represent a certain paradigm of consciousness. In particular, Kavolis discussed the paradigm of the "independent human". In this article, the author suggests a premise that Aldona Liobytė’s activities in the field of culture and her sociocultural standpoint match the paradigm of "the independent human", even if under restricted conditions of the regime. The article gives an overview of Liobytė’s publications in the press (book reviews, articles, reviews, reports) and the issues of cultural diversity, artistic innovation, modernity, and historical memory addressed therein. Her contributions to the press highlight her educative intentions: her aspiration to nurture cultural and aesthetic literacy of the public, to acquaint the readers with the news in the theatre art, to promote critical reflection on artistic language and the human condition of the modern individual. She also deemed it necessary to develop historical consciousness of the younger generation. Her articles on the architecture of Vilnius and ethnographic festivals emanate her efforts to arouse young people’s interest in deeper cultural traditions.Liobytė’s journalistic texts stand out in their temperamental style, which, due to its emotional load, theatrical qualities, metaphors from fairy-tales and cookery, created a space of a more intimate conversation in Soviet public discourse as an alternative to the official torrent of bureaucratic ideologised language. Thus, in her journalistic texts Aldona Liobytė expanded the boundaries of official discourse at the thematic and expressive levels. Her articles feature the sociocultural posture of the temperamental patroness of educative attitudes, which was an unexpected profile of consciousness in the repressive atmosphere of the protracted post-war period. [From the publication]
