Ar dirbtinis intelektas užvaldys pasaulį?

LTVytauto Rubavičiaus monografijoje „Ar dirbtinis intelektas užvaldys pasaulį?“ filosofiškai analizuojami žmogui, fiziniam bei dvasiniam jo pasauliui ir visai nežmogiškajai planetos gamtai dirbtinio intelekto technologijų keliami pavojai. Turint galvoje perdėm optimistinį ir nekritišką daugumos šiuolaikinių žmonių žavėjimąsi naujausiomis technologijomis, ši įžvalgi, svariais argumentais grįsta knyga turėtų atverti akis ne vienam aklam dirbtinio intelekto entuziastui. Be atožvalgos į pasaulinius šios temos svarstymo kontekstus, monografijoje pateikiama daug originalių paties autoriaus pastebėjimų, kuriais pratęsiamos ir toliau plėtojamos ankstesniuose jo veikaluose suformuluotos pozicijos. Ypač vertingos tos knygos vietos, kuriose atskleidžiama, kaip, sukūrus ir pradėjus taikyti dirbtinį intelektą bei keliant jį pavyzdžiu bet kokios rūšies ar kilmės intelektui, prigimtinis paties žmogaus intelektas mėginamas konfigūruoti pagal dirbtinio intelekto pavyzdį, užuot, kaip įprasta daugumoje šiai temai skirtų teorinių darbų, mąstant tik apie tai, kaip dirbtinis intelektas kuriamas, technologiškai pamėgdžiojant žmogaus intelektą: dirbtinis intelektas, užuot tapęs technologiniu žmogaus intelekto pratęsimu – žmogui naudingu įrankiu, privalančiu antropologiškai nekeisti paties jo naudotojo, iš tiesų – lyg tam tikros inversinės teleologijos būdu – patį žmogų ir prigimtinį jo intelektą pradeda nejučia keisti pagal savo paties – dirbtinio intelekto – pavyzdį ir panašumą, žmogų ir jo intelektą paversdamas savo įrankiu.Tai, kas turėjo būti naudojama kaip įrankis, iš tiesų patį jo naudotoją paverčia įrankiu – sakytume, įrankio įrankiu. Tokiu būdu natūralus žmogiškasis mąstymas gundomas ar net brutaliai verčiamas atsisakyti tų savo galių, kurios nesileidžia perkeičiamos pagal dirbtinio intelekto pavyzdį ir standartus, – o juk tai yra ne kas kita, kaip bandymas technologinėmis priemonėmis pakeisti pačią žmogaus prigimtį. [Naglis Kardelis].

ENThe book was completed while Muscovy was plundering and destroying Ukraine and its people for the fourth year. The world is witnessing the greatest war in Europe. The heroic resistance of the Ukrainians in the first weeks of the aggression, which stunned Western countries, turned into nothing the plans of the Kremlin ruler to annex Ukraine with a lightning-fast „military operation“ and announce to the world the „recovery“ of Russian lands. The resistance of the Ukrainians to the aggression of the Muscovite horde has tremendously accelerated the development, production and application of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies and devices not in simulation games, but in real battles. Increasingly „autonomous“, drones for various purposes have transformed from auxiliary military equipment into one of the most important types of weapons with their own special units and scientific production laboratories. Military robots that independently participate in military operations, evacuate the wounded from the battlefield, and assist in reconnaissance are already being tested. Another „hotbed“ of widespread application of AI military technologies is the massive military operation that Israel conducted in the Gaza Strip, aiming to destroy the terrorist organization Hamas after its bloody attack on October 7, 2023. The scale and intensity of military operations in a complex urban, densely populated environment have forced the military to increasingly delegate decisions to destroy targets and kill to AI systems. AI systems are able to process huge flows of information about changing combat circumstances, the probabilities of the appearance of targets intended for destruction in one place or another, their movement, and other things much faster than the operators controlling them.The reality of the Kremlin‘s fierce aggression forces to cross the seemingly „immovable“ red lines in the field of AI technology application that existed until recently – AI-controlled devices must in no way gain such autonomy that would allow them to make decisions to kill people. Looking at the documents of major countries of the world and the European Union, which aim to establish the legal foundations and guidelines for the development and application of AI technologies and their supervision, we clearly understand how efforts to understand and legitimize certain safeguards for the interaction of humans and AI technologies, so that the supervision of AI devices does not escape from human hands, lag far behind the realities of AI application. T he classified military bars for the development and application of AI technologies are increasingly inaccessible to the public. Artistic scientific creation can no longer do without the help of AI, and the AI art market is expanding. This shows that humans will never be able to fully control AI technologies, including the humanoid robots created on their basis, which will inevitably become part of a robot „society“ once the perception of the moral status of „digital minds“ is established and legitimized.T he breakthrough in the development and application of AI technologies hit the world in the second decade, when, using and perfecting large language models, AI began to communicate with humans not only in real time, solving problems posed to them, helping to create a variety of texts and other works, conducting scientific research, but also expressing various „human feelings“, helping the device become a „best friend“ or even a lover. The development of AI marks a new stage in the development of global capitalism, in which not only people‘s feelings, their creative expressions are commodified and resourcified, but also the linguistic layers of the world are fully monetized by the Google search engine. T his stage is named in various ways, depending on which aspect is distinguished and discussed as special or dominant – postmodern, media, linguistic, data, infotechnological or platform capitalism. Karl Marx predicted that the creation and application of technology would increasingly determine the development of the capitalist system and its economy. In the 20th century. Martin Heidegger and Jacques Ellul discussed in detail the inevitable dominance of the technical system in the world in which man lives – man no longer controls the technical system, but is forced, without even realizing it, to act according to the logic of the development of that system. It establishes the essential goal of the constant renewal of technology, called progress. [...].