Administracinė diskrecija ir jos vertinimas teismų praktikoje

Direct Link:
Collection:
Mokslo publikacijos / Scientific publications
Document Type:
Straipsnis / Article
Language:
Lietuvių kalba / Lithuanian
Title:
Administracinė diskrecija ir jos vertinimas teismų praktikoje
Alternative Title:
Administrative discretion and its judicial evaluation
In the Journal:
Jurisprudencija [Jurisprudence]. 2006, Nr. 5 (83), p. 65-72
Keywords:
LT
Administracinė diskrecija; Administracinės diskrecijos teisminis vertinimas (teisminė kontrolė).
EN
Administrative discretion; Judicial control of administrative discretion; Judicial evaluation.
Summary / Abstract:

LTStraipsnyje administracinės diskrecijos samprata atskleidžiama ir su ja susiję klausimai nagrinėjami įvardijant tinkamo administracinės diskrecijos įgyvendinimo reglamentavimo problemą, turinčią tiesioginės įtakos ir viešojo administravimo institucijoms suteiktos administracinės diskrecijos kontrolės problemiškumui. Daugiausia dėmesio skiriama teisminio administracinės diskrecijos vertinimo problemai. Analizuojant esamą administracinių teismų praktiką siekiama atsakyti į klausimą, kokiu būdu (ir ar apskritai) administracinis teismas Lietuvoje susiduria su administracinės diskrecijos klausimu ir kokios šiandien yra teismo galimybės vertinti, ar tinkamai viešojo administravimo srityje įgyvendinama administracinė diskrecija. [Iš leidinio]

ENThe article concentrates on the concept of administrative discretion and other issues concerning its proper exercise and control in the Republic of Lithuania. In particular, theoretical and practical aspects relating to the issue of the adequacy of evaluation of administrative discretion in Lithuanian administrative courts are analyzed. A conclusion is made that the main problems relating to the exercise and the judicial control of administrative discretion in Lithuania are mostly conditioned by the lack of consistent and adequate legal base establishing, on the one hand, the main principles, standards upon which it must be exercised in a proper and lawful manner so as to be in conformity with the intentions of the legislature that conferred it, and, on the other hand, the role of administrative courts in the process of examination of whether discretionary powers had been implemented properly. Presently, the Law on Administrative Proceedings of the Republic of Lithuania does not provide for an unambiguous possibility for an administrative court to scrutinize the exercise of administrative discretion beyond the examining of compliance of the act of an administrative body with the authority conferred to it, the main relevant procedural requirements, legally recognized general administrative principles, and, depending on the concrete case, possibly its compliance with other special standards or principles, prescribed by relevant laws applicable in that specific situation.Therefore when a Lithuanian administrative court comes across an issue of the use of administrative discretion it tends to recognize the spheres in which administrative authorities are granted discretionary powers, but judicial evaluation of administrative acts belonging to such areas is restricted. Naturally, there is also no possibility provided for in the Law on Administrative Proceedings to declare an administrative act as unlawful on the sole basis that it had been concluded that the said administrative act had been passed in the result of an improper exercise of discretionary administrative powers. It is concluded in the article that laws regulating administrative judicial proceedings in the Republic of Lithuania must be amended so as to include a possibility for the court to examine the use of discretionary powers in scrutiny, as well as to establish the right of the court to annul such an act on the sole basis that an improper use of administrative discretion had been determined. [From the publication]

ISSN:
1392-6195; 2029-2058
Subject:
Related Publications:
Permalink:
https://www.lituanistika.lt/content/34056
Updated:
2018-12-17 11:54:52
Metrics:
Views: 14    Downloads: 5
Export: