Intensyvi priežiūra: procesinės prievartos veiksmingumo ir intervencijos į privatų gyvenimą disonanso problema

LTStraipsnyje analizuojamas intensyvios priežiūros teisinis reguliavimas, jo tobulinimo perspektyvos, teisėtumo ir proporcingumo principų tarpusavio derinimo problematika teisės j privatų gyvenimų kontekste. Autoriai vertina, ar šios kardomosios priemonės reglamentavimas pateisina įstatymų leidėjo lūkesčius, ar ši priemonė tėra tik kitų kardomųjų priemonių veiksmingumo vienas iš instrumentų, ar vis dėlto intensyvia priežiūra galima pasiekti savarankiškų ir individualių tikslų. Šios analizės lyginamieji aspektai leido formuluoti išvadas bei siūlymus dėl šios priemonės taikymo teisėsaugos institucijų praktikoje.

ENThe present article focuses on the intensive supervision as a procedural coercive measures considered to be one of the most stringent security measures in criminal procedure. When the elements essential to offence become evident, there is the duty of the law enforcement officers to detect the criminal offence and establish the truth about the event in regard of which criminal proceeding was initiated. In the rule-of-law states the truth is sought not at random but observing and respecting certain moral and constitutional values. Intensive supervision is one of the tools that might enable the prosecutors to collect the data significant in the pre-trial investigation. Taking the decision on whether application of this tool is necessary or redundant is dictated by factual the circumstances of a particular case and the principles of law. Collection of the proof forming evidence when applying procedural coercion is legal and well-founded only in case if such coercion is exercised observing the boundaries set by the principles of proportionality, necessity and legitimacy. Aiming at a more consistent revelation of intensive supervision the article discusses the concept of intensive supervision, analyzes its legal regulation in the Republic of Lithuania and several neighbouring states, describes court practice in ordering application of the intensive supervision model laid down by the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Lithuania as compared to other security measures available. The article also points out some redundant procedural coercion risk factors, addresses the role of proportionality, necessity and legitimacy principles in the context of intensive supervision, and provides proposals for election tactics and application such measure.