Знаки ударения в орфографии Катехизиса М. Даукши 1595 года: опыт количественного исследования

Collection:
Mokslo publikacijos / Scientific publications
Document Type:
Straipsnis / Article
Language:
Rusų kalba / Russian
Title:
Знаки ударения в орфографии Катехизиса М. Даукши 1595 года: опыт количественного исследования
Alternative Title:
Diacritic marks and orthography in M. Daukša's Catechism of 1595: a quantitative aspect
In the Journal:
Индоевропейское языкознание и классическая филология [Indo-European linguistics and classical philology]. 2013, 17, p. 16-25. Материалы чтений, посвященных памяти профессора И. М. Тронского, 24–26 июня 2013 г
Keywords:
LT
Kirčiavimas. Tartis. Akcentologija / Accent. Accentology; Rašyba. Skyryba. Ortografija / Spelling. Punctation. Orthography.
Summary / Abstract:

LTReikšminiai žodžiai: Kirčiavimas; Lietuvių kalbos istorija; Orfografija; Raštai; Rašyba; Statistinė analizė; Tekstologija; Accent; Accentuation; History of the Lithuanian language; Lithuanian language history; Old literary works; Orthography; Spelling; Statistical analysis; Textology.

ENThe text of the first known Lithuanian book printed in the mainland (M. Daukša's Catechism of 1595) is analysed in a quantitative way. Thorough study of diacritic marks is attempted. It is confirmed that the text actually contains three different diacritics: a circumflex, an acute and a dot; the two latter are at variance with each other, but the choice of the main variant appears to depend on the role of the sign. It is discovered that, unlike previously thought, the distinction between long and short accented vowels is maintained in the text, at least for vowels which exhibit phonological opposition between long and short ones. There are several cases where the distinction between long and short vowels is possibly maintained even in an unaccented position. Other vowels demonstrate greater variance in accent mark usage, but generally it may be assumed that a circumflex sign denotes a long vowel. Frequent omission of an accent mark over short lower vowels is linked to a pholonologically conditioned difficulty to distinguish an accented short vowel from unaccented one. The distribution of various accent marks in diphtongs still remains an unsolved issue, though, pending for future research. [From the publication]

ISBN:
9785020383371
ISSN:
2306-9015
Related Publications:
Permalink:
https://www.lituanistika.lt/content/81277
Updated:
2020-04-24 06:54:11
Metrics:
Views: 17
Export: