ENArticle 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights and Article 92 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia covers not only the classic court authorities, but also quasi courts. The above legal norms are not categorical and do not provide strictly that the rights to a fair and open hearing of the case can be implemented by applying to the court only. The quasi court possessed several advantages in comparison to the court, e. g. the informality of the process, specialization, accessibility that ensures efficient private parties’ judicial protection and dispute resolution. Quasi courts can hear a high number of cases within a comparatively short time period. Slightly distant legal control from the point of view of time ensures higher quality of the administrative procedure.