Izteicēja funkcijā lietoti lietuviešu valodas ciešamās kārtas pagātnes un tagadnes divdabji un to atbilsme latviešu valodā

ENThe objective of this study is to establish the correspondences of the Lithuanian past passive and present passive participles as predicates in Latvian. This study is based on the Lithuanian-Latvian-Lithuanian Parallel Corpus (LiLa) Lithuanian-Latvian subcorpus of different genres (fiction, journalism, documents, etc.) that contains ~3.5 million running words. Based on the analysed data, it is proved that past passive and present passive participles as predicates in Lithuanian are used more widely than in Latvian. It was established that Lithuanian past passive and present passive participle as predicate has various correspondences in Latvian: 1) The passive voice and past passive participle as predicate (ir/tika mests). The sentences have been used in passive in both languages. Usually the corresponding Latvian predicate has been used in the same tense and mood as in Lithuanian. 2) The active voice and active verb forms as predicate (meta). The examples in Lithuanian have been used in passive, but corresponding sentences in Latvian have been used in active voice. Not all the correspondences are regular. There are some examples with the corresponding predicate in Latvian that has been used in debitive – a mood that does not exist in Lithuanian. The necessity has been expressed by other means in Lithuanian. 3) The passive present participle as predicate (ir metams). The passive present participle in Latvian usually expresses necessity (akmens ir metams) and possibility (celtne ir ieraugāma). Although it is proved that the active voice in Latvian has been used more widely than in Lithuanian, many examples in active voice in Latvian clearly have a meaning of passive voice.