Valstybės ir viešosios teisės juridinių asmenų teisė sudaryti arbitražinį susitarimą

LTŠiame straipsnyje analizuojamas Komercinio arbitražo įstatymo 11 straipsnio 2 dalies normos, nustatančios reikalavimą valstybės bei savivaldybės įmonėms, įstaigoms ir organizacijoms sudarant arbitražinį susitarimą gauti steigėjo sutikimą, taikymas. Kartu pateikiamas ir panašių apribojimų, nustatytų kitų valstybių nacionaliniuose įstatymuose, vertinimas užsienio teismų ir arbitražo praktikoje bei doktrinoje. [Iš leidinio]Reikšminiai žodžiai: Komercinis arbitražas; Arbitražinis susitarimas; Juridiniai asmenys; Commercial Arbitration; Arbitration agreement; Legal persons.

ENArticle 11(2) of the Law on Commercial Arbitration of the Republic of Lithuania provides that disputes, the party to which is a state or municipal entity as well as a state or municipal institution or organization may not be submitted to arbitration unless an advance consent to such agreement has been given by the founder of such entity, institution or organisation. Similar restrictions can be found in the law so the other countries as well. The main purpose of there search is to answer the question whether Article 11(2) of the Law on Commercial Arbitration is applicable in international commercial arbitration. The question is caused by the fact that foreign courts and arbitral tribunals usually refuse to take into account similar restrictions. The refusal to apply restriction provided in national laws is based on the principe that the states and legal persons of public law can not rely on restrictive provisions of their own law to challenge the validity of arbitration agreements. The Article addresses the developmen to the above mentioned principe in court and arbitration practice and legal doctrine as well as the argumentation of the principle. The Article also contains anglysis of the Lithuanian court practice regarding application of Article 11(2) of the Law on Commercial Arbitration. [From the publication]