Μια αριστοτελικη κριτικη του φιλοσοφικου προγραμματοσ του Martin Heidegger στο εργο του ειναι και χρονοσ

LTStraipsnyje pateikiama Aristoteliška Martino Heideggerio Sein und Zeit projekto kritika. Daugelis autorių akcentuoja ir brežia paraleles tarp Heideggerio ir Aristotelio filosofinių projektų. Šiame straipsnyje, priešingai, yra pabrėžiama Heideggerio Aristotelio filosofijos misinterpretacija, ypač kritikuojama Heideggerio arete (dorybės) atmetimas. Straipsnyje daroma išvada, kad Aristotelio telos (tikslo) samprata Heideggerio minty virsta buvimu mirties link (arba mirtimi) ir kad tokia interpretacija leidžia filosofiškai permąstyti Heideggerio buvimą-link-mirties geriausiu atveju kaip nerimastingos europietiškos modernybės nerimo šaltinį, o ne kaip sektina ir susižavėjimą keliančio filosofinio projekto centrine idėja. [MRU CRIS]

ENMartin Heidegger’s celebrated Being and Time, originally published in 1927, is a serious philosophical attempt to pose and answer the question of the meaning of being. Not only has it received enormous philosophical attention throughout the 20lh century and beyond, būt it also served as the beginning for a new kind of philosophizing. It gave birth to hermeneutic philosophy, especially to that of H. G. Gadamer’s, and to existentialism, to name būt the most obvious influences. Yet it was Heidegger’s engagement with Aristotle, especially in the form of his lectures delivered at Freiburg and Marburg in the early twenties, that paved the way to his Being and Time. It is not surprising that the interest in the relationship between Heidegger and Aristotle has been bourgeoning overpast few decades. The most noteworthy recent accounts are that of Ted Sadler (1996), Walter A. Brogan (2005), and Mark Sinclair (2006). Apart from notable examples (Maclntyre 2002), most of them are sympathetic to Heidegger. In this respect, my own engagement with Heidegger’s key arguments in Being and Time is different: it aims to emphasise incompatibility and contrast between Aristotle and Heidegger. As it will be argued in this paper, Heidegger accounts of temporality and human existence, even if were informed by his reading of Aristotle, were nonetheless based on the rejection of Aristotle’s teleology and the Aristotelian notion of excellence. As such, Heidegger’s project of Being and Time, if read in the light of Aristotle’s conception of arete, fails to provide us with a convincing philosophical account of the meaning of human existence.Thus, in this paper I will, first, aim to provide an exegesis of Heidegger’s Being and Time and, second, juxtapose Heidegger’s attempt to address the question of the meaning of being with that of an Aristotelian refleetion of excellence as the key philosophieal notion for us to address the question of the meaning of human life. Hence, although I am critical of Heidegger’s project of Sein imci Zeit, I share with him that the key question of philosophy is the question of the meaning ot being. [MRU CRIS]